Can using AI cause you to lose legal privilege?

Nathan Tetzlaff | July 27, 2026

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT have quickly become part of everyday life. People are increasingly using them to summarise documents, draft emails, analyse contracts and even seek a second opinion on legal issues.


However, if you're involved in a legal dispute, using AI without understanding the risks could have serious consequences.


Copying legal advice, settlement discussions or confidential documents into a public AI platform may put your legal privilege at risk. In some situations, it could even mean information you expected to remain confidential becomes available to the other party in litigation.


Here's what you need to know before using AI during a legal dispute.

Can Using AI Cause You to Lose Legal Privilege?

What is legal privilege?


Legal privilege is a legal protection recognised under the Evidence Act 2006. It allows certain communications and documents to remain confidential so they cannot generally be disclosed or used as evidence in court.


Common types of legal privilege include:


  • Legal professional privilege – confidential communications between you and your lawyer.
  • Litigation privilege – documents prepared primarily for existing or anticipated legal proceedings.
  • Settlement privilege – confidential communications made while attempting to resolve a dispute.


These protections encourage people to seek legal advice openly and negotiate disputes honestly without fear that their communications will later be used against them.


Can AI conversations be legally privileged?


Usually, no.


Legal professional privilege only applies to communications with a qualified legal adviser. An AI platform is not your lawyer, regardless of how sophisticated it may seem.


While some AI prompts created during litigation may initially qualify as preparatory material for legal proceedings, privilege depends on the information remaining confidential. If that confidentiality is lost, the privilege may be lost too.


How can legal privilege be lost?


One of the most common ways legal privilege is lost is through disclosure to a third party.

Many public AI platforms collect, store or process information entered by users. Depending on the platform, your prompts or uploaded documents may be:


  • stored on external servers
  • reviewed for quality or safety purposes
  • used to improve the AI model
  • processed outside New Zealand.


If you copy and paste confidential legal advice into one of these platforms, you may be disclosing privileged information to a third party.


Even if you never intended to waive privilege, your actions may be viewed as being inconsistent with maintaining confidentiality.


What information should never be entered into public AI tools?


If you're involved in a legal dispute, avoid uploading:


  • legal advice from your lawyer
  • draft affidavits or witness statements
  • court documents
  • settlement correspondence
  • confidential contracts
  • documents prepared specifically for litigation.


Treat public AI platforms the same way you would treat any unrelated third party.


What happens if privilege is waived?


If legal privilege is lost, the consequences can be significant.


Depending on the circumstances:


  • documents may need to be disclosed to the other party
  • confidential communications may become evidence
  • your legal strategy may become visible
  • admissions made during settlement discussions could potentially be relied upon.


While every situation is different, losing privilege can materially weaken your position in litigation.


Is using AI always risky?


Not necessarily.


Some enterprise AI platforms and AI products designed specifically for legal professionals include strong confidentiality protections and contractual obligations around data handling.


However, the position for many publicly available AI tools remains uncertain. Unless confidentiality is clearly protected, it is safest to assume that anything entered into a public AI platform may not remain confidential.


Five practical tips for litigants


If you're involved in a legal dispute:


  • Don't copy legal advice into public AI tools.
  • Don't upload settlement correspondence or court documents.
  • Ask your lawyer before using AI to analyse confidential information.
  • Treat AI platforms as independent third parties, not confidential advisers.
  • If in doubt, keep privileged information out of public AI systems altogether.


The bottom line


AI is a powerful tool and can provide genuine benefits when used appropriately.


However, when legal proceedings are involved, convenience should never come at the expense of confidentiality.


Before using AI to review legal advice, analyse settlement correspondence or prepare documents for litigation, speak with your lawyer first. A simple mistake today could have significant consequences later.


If you have questions about using AI during a legal dispute, or need advice about protecting privileged information, our litigation team is here to help.

  • Can ChatGPT keep legal advice confidential?

    Public AI platforms should generally not be treated as confidential. Before uploading legal advice or sensitive documents, speak with your lawyer.

  • Does using AI automatically waive legal privilege?

    Not always. However, sharing privileged information with an AI platform may create a real risk that privilege has been waived, depending on the circumstances and the platform used.

  • Can I upload court documents into ChatGPT?

    If you're involved in litigation, it's generally best not to upload court documents or confidential legal material into public AI tools without first obtaining legal advice.

  • Can lawyers use AI?

    Yes. Many law firms use secure AI systems that may be designed specifically for legal practice. These tools typically include confidentiality protections that differ from publicly available AI platforms.

  • Is paid AI safer than free AI?

    Some paid AI platforms offer stronger privacy and confidentiality protections than free versions. However, you should never assume a platform is suitable for confidential legal information without understanding its terms and data handling practices.

If you are involved in a dispute, we invite you to become a client of Smith and Partners. For tailored legal advice specific to your situation, please contact Nathan Tetzlaff at nathan.tetzlaff@smithpartners.co.nz or phone 09 837 6844, or complete the form below to arrange an appointment.

We will require a retainer to be paid prior to your first meeting, and we cannot assist with legal aid matters. Please note that, in accordance with our obligations under the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, we cannot provide legal advice unless you have become a client of Smith and Partners and have received our Terms & Conditions of Engagement and Info for Clients.

Loading author information...

Get In Touch

We're here to help. Tell us a little about what you need help with and one of our team will be in touch.

Read More Articles

First Home Buyers: Deposit vs Deposit – Understanding the Difference
By Fiona Taylor July 20, 2026
When buying a home, the word "deposit" can be confusing because it is used in two different and distinct ways.
Employment Law Changes 2026: Distinguishing Contractors From Employees
By Rachael Chandra June 18, 2026
The Employment Relations Amendment Act 2026 came into force on 21 February 2026 and introduces a series of significant changes to the Employment Relations Act 2000 (“the Act”).
Left Out of Your Parent’s Will? Your Rights and Estate Claims Explained
By Carolyn Ranson June 13, 2026
Being left out of a parent’s Will — or receiving less than you expected — can be both surprising and distressing. The law in New Zealand provides that, in many cases, this may not be the end of the matter.
Why Estate Disputes Still Happen: The 2026 Patterns behind Estate Claims
By Carolyn Ranson June 7, 2026
In our experience, estate disputes are rarely unexpected. They tend to arise where known risk factors—such as estrangement, informal caregiving arrangements, or uneven provision in a will—have not been addressed clearly during lifetime.