The Tort of Negligence NZ

Nathan Tetzlaff | December 22, 2019

Legal disputes generally fall into one of three main categories:

  • Breach of contract
  • Breach of law
  • A tort.

Torts are a type of obligation created by judges.

The most common and well-known tort is the tort of negligence.  If a builder does a bad job you might have a claim against them for negligence.  If somebody drives into your car causing damage, that’s another claim for negligence.

There can be different types of breaches coming from the same situation.   In the builder example above, the builder might be in breach of their contract with you as well as being negligent.  In that case if you sued them, you would claim for breach of contract and breach of tort, although you couldn’t get compensation for both.

General Principles of Negligence

The tort of negligence has developed over time, but the key principles were established in a very famous English case called Donoghue v Stevenson.  In that case a person fell ill after drinking from a bottle that turned out to have a dead snail in it. The elements of negligence established in that case are:

  • One person has a duty to another person;
  • That person breaches their duty;
  • The second person suffers some kind of harm or loss as a result.

In the Donoghue case the duty was to make sure that the manufacturer didn’t allow snails or any other noxious substance to make their way into their products. The breach was allowing the snail to get into the bottle unnoticed.  The loss was the illness suffered by Donoghue, and their medical bills.

Any situation where a person has a duty can give rise to negligence if that duty is breached. The duty does not have to be expressly agreed, although it can be.

Duties can arise from all sorts of situations. It’s up to the court to decide whether a particular situation results in a duty. Some examples of duties are:

  • The duty on person on an e-scooter to watch out not to ride into pedestrians on the footpath;
  • The duty on a tradesman to do their job to an ordinary competent standard;
  • The duty on an accountant to give correct tax advice; and
  • The duty on a farmer to ensure that their cattle do not eat a neighbour’s crops.

Compensation

If a person has committed the tort of negligence the victim can claim financial compensation for the losses that they have suffered. This could include the cost of hiring somebody else to repair defective building work, or replacing property which has been damaged by negligence.

Because of ACC, it is NOT possible to claim for a personal injury covered by ACC even when this is caused by negligence.  In the case of an e-scooter rider who bumps into someone because they were speeding and not paying attention, they wouldn’t be liable for that person’s medical bills, but could be liable to pay for the phone that they dropped and was broken in the crash.

A person’s losses can include more than just the cost of putting the negligent work right.  Indirect losses might also be claimed.  In the example of a negligent builder, if the house could not be inhabited while the work was being fixed then the homeowner might be entitled to claim the costs of finding alternative accommodation for that period.

What can be claimed and what can’t be claimed depends on whether there is enough causation between the loss and the negligent conduct. This generally depends on what losses are reasonably foreseeable from the negligent conduct.

Using the example of a negligent driver who causes a car crash, it is reasonably foreseeable that driving negligently could cause property damage to another person’s car so this amount would be claimable. However, if the person they crashed into was made late for an important meeting and wasn’t able to close a significant deal as result, they probably could NOT make a claim for the loss of that deal.  That loss is too indirect and is not be reasonably foreseeable by the negligent driver.

Punitive Damages

In some cases, the court will award punitive damages.  This is an amount over and above the victim’s actual losses.  Punitive damages are a penalty on the negligent person to punish them for their negligence in extreme or particularly serious situations.  This is only awarded in rare cases and the amounts of punitive damages are not as large as in some other countries (such as the United States).

Loading author information...

Get In Touch

Read More Articles

Brown and white brick building with tower, under blue sky.
By Mikayla Sagar February 15, 2026
Probate vs. Letters of Administration
Wedding rings on divorce papers as someone signs; blue and white.
By Natalie Miller February 6, 2026
Most people think prenups are something celebrities sign before a whirlwind wedding. But in New Zealand, a contracting out agreement is far more common, far more practical and, for many couples, essential. Under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (“Act”), the guiding principle is that all relationship property should be shared equally when a de facto relationship, civil union, or marriage ends. There are certain exceptions – as always. The only way to avoid the presumed 50/50 sharing regime is to contract out of the Act. That is exactly what a contracting out agreement does. If the agreement meets the legal requirements, it allows couples to decide for themselves how their assets and liabilities will be divided if the relationship ends through separation or death. What happens if you don’t have one?  If you are in a qualifying relationship and don’t have a contracting out agreement in place, most of what you own or owe could be divided equally if you separate or if one partner dies. Think you are safe because the asset is in your sole name or was gifted to you? Think again. In certain circumstances these types of property could still be up for equal division. Why you should seriously consider one For many people, the primary motivation is protection. A contracting out agreement can ring fence specific assets so they remain your separate property, such as a home you purchased before the relationship or savings you built independently. It can also ensure you do not become responsible for your partner’s debt, such as a student loan or personal liabilities that you had no part in creating. Just as importantly, a contracting out agreement sets clear expectations for how newly acquired assets and debts are owned and managed during the relationship and what will happen to those if the relationship ends. By defining everything upfront, the agreement can prevent confusion, conflict and costly disputes later. When can you get a contracting out agreement? A contracting out agreement can be put in place at almost any stage. Some couples arrange one at the very beginning of a relationship. Others do it after buying a home together, having children or blending finances. It is also possible to enter into one at the end of a relationship. However, the safest and cleanest approach is to get one as early as possible, ideally before the relationship becomes a qualifying relationship or before either partner acquires rights under the Act.
Two pairs of hands clasped together, suggesting support and comfort.
By Kimberley Brown February 6, 2026
Writing your own Will or using a DIY Will Kit may seem like an easy and cost-effective option. However, while a homemade or online Will may appear to save money upfront, it will often cause major complications and costs in the long run. Learn why getting legal advice ensures your Will is valid, effective, and truly reflects your wishes.
Hand holding a notepad with
By Kimberley Brown February 5, 2026
Even a small error in your Will can cause significant delays and unnecessary expenses once it reaches the High Court for Probate.