Explaining Grants of Administration

Mikayla Sagar | February 15, 2026

Probate vs. Letters of Administration

When someone dies holding significant assets in their sole name such as land, bank accounts, Kiwisaver, and/or insurance policies each worth over $40,000.00, or shares and/or debentures worth over $15,000.00, a grant of administration must be obtained from the High Court in order to deal with those assets (e.g. sell the land, close the bank accounts, claim on insurance policies, etc.)


There are two types of grant of administration: 


  1. Probate; and
  2. Letters of Administration. 



Probate


Probate is required when someone dies with a will and they hold assets in their sole name over the prescribed thresholds noted above. 


Obtaining probate is the process of making an application to the High Court to have the deceased’s will proved and accepted as their last will. A ‘grant of probate’ is the Court order which evidences this. 


By obtaining a grant of probate, the executor named in the will is confirmed and granted the authority by Court order to deal with the estate. The executor is responsible for bringing in the assets of the estate, paying the estate’s debts and testamentary expenses, and then distributing the estate to the beneficiaries in accordance with the law and the terms of the will. This is known as administering the estate. 


In some cases, the executor may be required to hold estate assets on trust for beneficiaries, for example if there is a minor beneficiary or a life interest. 


Letters of Administration 


Letters of Administration is required when someone dies intestate (without a will) and they hold assets in their sole name over the prescribed thresholds. This type of grant of administration is often mistaken to be a literal “letter” – unfortunately this is not the case. 


Obtaining Letters of Administration is very similar to obtaining probate. An application to the High Court must be made to have someone appointed as the administrator of the estate, who is granted the authority to deal with the estate, again by Court order. 


Additional steps such as advertising for a will and requesting a Status of Children search through Births Deaths and Marriages must also be completed before filing the application. 


As there is no will which appoints an executor, the Administration Act prescribes a ‘priority order’ for those who are entitled to apply to the High Court to be appointed the administrator of the deceased’s estate (the terms ‘administrator’ and ‘executor’ are often used interchangeably). 


The ‘grant of Letters of Administration’ is the Court order which sets out who the High Court has appointed as administrator of the estate, which will be the person who made the application. The appointed administrator has the same powers and responsibilities as an executor regarding the estate: to bring in the assets, pay the estate debts and testamentary expenses, and distribute the estate. 


As to distribution of an intestate estate, the Administration Act dictates who is entitled to the assets of the estate and what they are entitled to (in lieu of instructions in a will). This may not be what the deceased would wish which highlights the importance of having a will in place. 


Letters of Administration with Will Annexed 


A hybrid between probate and Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration with Will Annexed is required when someone dies with a will and they hold assets over the prescribed thresholds, but the will cannot be proven to the High Court. The circumstances in which a will cannot be proven include: 


  1. The will does not appoint an executor. 
  2. An executor is appointed under the will but the executor has: 
  3. predeceased the will-maker; 
  4. survived the will-maker but has since died themselves before obtaining a grant of administration; 
  5. has renounced their right and title to probate of the will and there is no substitute executor appointed in the will; 
  6. is the former spouse or civil union partner of the will-maker whose appointment is void under section 19 of the Wills Act 2007; or 
  7. they are incapable of acting as an executor and they do not have a power of attorney in place. 


If the above applies, the residuary beneficiaries named in the will have the first priority to apply to the High Court for appointment as administrator of the estate.   


I think I need to obtain one of these grants. What should I do? 


If you are an executor named in a will, or if a loved one has died without a will and you’d like to apply to be appointed the administrator of the estate, we strongly recommend you instruct a lawyer to assist you with this application. 


Our estates team have extensive experience in preparing applications for probate and Letters of Administration and are happy to assist. 

Loading author information...

Get In Touch

Read More Articles

Wedding rings on divorce papers as someone signs; blue and white.
By Natalie Miller February 6, 2026
Most people think prenups are something celebrities sign before a whirlwind wedding. But in New Zealand, a contracting out agreement is far more common, far more practical and, for many couples, essential. Under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (“Act”), the guiding principle is that all relationship property should be shared equally when a de facto relationship, civil union, or marriage ends. There are certain exceptions – as always. The only way to avoid the presumed 50/50 sharing regime is to contract out of the Act. That is exactly what a contracting out agreement does. If the agreement meets the legal requirements, it allows couples to decide for themselves how their assets and liabilities will be divided if the relationship ends through separation or death. What happens if you don’t have one?  If you are in a qualifying relationship and don’t have a contracting out agreement in place, most of what you own or owe could be divided equally if you separate or if one partner dies. Think you are safe because the asset is in your sole name or was gifted to you? Think again. In certain circumstances these types of property could still be up for equal division. Why you should seriously consider one For many people, the primary motivation is protection. A contracting out agreement can ring fence specific assets so they remain your separate property, such as a home you purchased before the relationship or savings you built independently. It can also ensure you do not become responsible for your partner’s debt, such as a student loan or personal liabilities that you had no part in creating. Just as importantly, a contracting out agreement sets clear expectations for how newly acquired assets and debts are owned and managed during the relationship and what will happen to those if the relationship ends. By defining everything upfront, the agreement can prevent confusion, conflict and costly disputes later. When can you get a contracting out agreement? A contracting out agreement can be put in place at almost any stage. Some couples arrange one at the very beginning of a relationship. Others do it after buying a home together, having children or blending finances. It is also possible to enter into one at the end of a relationship. However, the safest and cleanest approach is to get one as early as possible, ideally before the relationship becomes a qualifying relationship or before either partner acquires rights under the Act.
Two pairs of hands clasped together, suggesting support and comfort.
By Kimberley Brown February 6, 2026
Writing your own Will or using a DIY Will Kit may seem like an easy and cost-effective option. However, while a homemade or online Will may appear to save money upfront, it will often cause major complications and costs in the long run. Learn why getting legal advice ensures your Will is valid, effective, and truly reflects your wishes.
Hand holding a notepad with
By Kimberley Brown February 5, 2026
Even a small error in your Will can cause significant delays and unnecessary expenses once it reaches the High Court for Probate.
Couple holding a red heart in front of their faces, possibly kissing, against a bright background.
By Natalie Miller February 4, 2026
Many people are surprised to learn that they may already be in a de facto relationship in the eyes of New Zealand law, even if they have never formally defined the relationship. This legal status can have significant consequences for how property, assets and liabilities are treated if the relationship ends. Why does it matter? It is important to understand whether you are in a de facto relationship or not because once a de facto relationship has lasted three years (or two years if there is a child of the relationship), relationship property is generally subject to equal sharing. Critically, the equal sharing regime usually includes the home the couple lives in, even if that property was acquired by one partner before the relationship began and/or is in their sole name. What is a de facto relationship? Under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (“the Act”), a de facto relationship exists when two people of any gender, who are both at least 18 and who are not married or in a civil union with each other, are living together as a couple. Although the term “living together” sounds simple, the law interprets it more broadly than many expect. How the court decides if a de facto relationship exists If there is uncertainty about whether a de facto relationship exists, or when it started, the Court considers a range of factors. These include the length of the relationship, whether the couple shares a home and a bedroom, whether the partners have a sexual relationship and how their financial affairs are arranged, including whether there is dependence or interdependence between them. The Court may also look at whether the partners own or use property together, whether they demonstrate a mutual commitment to a shared life, whether they care for children together, how household duties are divided and how their relationship is viewed by friends, family and the public. No single factor is decisive. The Court has a wide discretion to weigh these circumstances and determine whether a de facto relationship exists based on the overall context. De facto relationships of short duration The Act can also apply to de facto relationships of short duration (i.e. less than three years). This may occur if the couple shares a child or if one partner has made a substantial contribution and the Court considers that a serious injustice would result. In these situations, property is divided according to each partner’s contributions rather than the equal sharing regime. Polyamorous relationships Although the Act defines a de facto relationship as being between two persons, the Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that polyamorous relationships can also fall within the framework of the Act. The Court confirmed that a polyamorous partnership may amount to a series of de facto relationships. In the case before the Court, three partners were involved in overlapping relationships, (two de facto relationships and one marriage) and their intermingling relationship property interests were subject to division under the Act. Protect yourself – get a contracting out agreement If you are in a de facto relationship, or think you may be in one, it is sensible to consider a contracting out agreement. This agreement can ring fence specific assets so they remain your separate property and can ensure you do not become responsible for your partner’s debt that you had no part in creating. It can also set out clear expectations as to how future property will be classified and how assets and liabilities will be divided if the relationship ends through separation or death.